Grigoriy Lomakin vs Tommaso Carnevale-Miino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Lomakin vs T. Carnevale-Miino

Grigoriy Lomakin
KAZ
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
27
Age
25
6'6" (198 cm)
Height
6'5" (196 cm)
862
C. Rank
0
713
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Tommaso Carnevale-Miino
ITA
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
27
Age
25
6'6" (198 cm)
Height
6'5" (196 cm)
862
C. Rank
0
713
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Lomakin 0 - 0 Carnevale-Miino
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Lomakin | 0 |
Carnevale-Miino | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
G. Lomakin vs T. Carnevale-Miino H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
36.23% (150-264) | Career Total W/L | 48.07% (87-94) |
1 | Titles | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Lomakin vs T. Carnevale-Miino Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Grigoriy Lomakin has won 44.91% of points on their second serve, while Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Grigoriy Lomakin, in recent form, has won 51.05% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.13% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Grigoriy Lomakin has saved 54.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Grigoriy Lomakin has won 37.29% of matches played (W/L 22/37), with Tommaso Carnevale-Miino winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Grigoriy Lomakin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 87/130), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 13/35). Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 28/35).
- Player level: In the last year, Grigoriy Lomakin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 22/33), where as Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Grigoriy Lomakin has played against opponents with an average rank of 345.56 while Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Grigoriy Lomakin has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Grigoriy Lomakin has converted 32.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Grigoriy Lomakin vs Tommaso Carnevale-Miino Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Lomakin 44%, Carnevale-Miino 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Lomakin 49%, Carnevale-Miino 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Lomakin 60%, Carnevale-Miino 0%.
G. Lomakin Recent Matches Played
T. Carnevale-Miino Recent Matches Played

G. Lomakin vs T. Carnevale-Miino Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
36.23% (150/264) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.07% (87/94) |
38.87% (365/574) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.62% (198/201) |
46.57% (4217/4839) | Games Win/Loss | 50.30% (1837/1815) |
40.09% (87/130) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.44% (28/35) |
33.56% (50/99) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (57/57) |
27.08% (13/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
1451 | Aces Total | 82 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
761 | Total Double Faults | 204 |
1:24:22 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
462.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 215.2 |
68% (15698/23097) | 1st Serve % | 66% (2448/3691) |
66% (10408/15698) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1473/2448) |
47% (3490/7399) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (557/1243) |
36% (664/1846) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (149/333) |
36% (8154/22889) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1343/3400) |
0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
12.24% (6/43) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
39.67% (144/219) | Futures W/L | 48.07% (87/94) |
36% (147/411) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (85/174) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
40% (61/151) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (13/25) |
39% (45/114) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (18/44) |
79% (166/131) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (91/80) |
21% (166/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (91/10) |
7% (248/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (90/7) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
11:00 AM 10/10/25
PredictionW1
1.74
W2
2.01
10:00 AM 10/10/25
PredictionW1
2.76
W2
1.39
07:00 PM 10/10/25
PredictionW1
1.49
W2
2.49
10:15 PM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
1.12
W2
5.3
01:30 PM 10/10/25
PredictionW1
2.49
W2
1.53
08:35 PM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
2.68
W2
1.43
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
08:00
H2H 7-5
13:30
H2H 7-4
06:00
H2H 1-4
14:00
H2H 0-5
10:00
H2H 0-2
Tennis Events This Week
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai
China
Cali Challenger
Colombia
Fairfield Challenger
United States
Hersonissos 5 Challenger
Greece
Jinan Challenger
China
Roanne Challenger
France
Valencia Challenger
Spain
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Kigali
Rwanda
M25 Perth
Australia
M25 Rio de Janeiro
Brazil